-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added an automated Selenium UI test for a small Zimit2 archive #1286
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@Jaifroid I have not added test for android & ios page because i didn't know what test should i do, your suggestion will be appreciated 😅😃 Thanks! |
Thank you @THEBOSS0369. That's very useful. I would suggest adding a test that switches to the page that shows the Android and iOS store images, and verifying that both images have loaded correctly:
|
Hey @Jaifroid ! I have added the android and ios test as you asked me but there is a problem occurring when i am running the tests the i have tried by making the waititme 120000 , by removin cache but still this won't work. I don't understand what i am doing wrong i checked in the sw mode the image's alt is present and i have added the same in the code. Your help will be appreciated . Thanks! |
Thanks @THEBOSS0369. Sorry to hear about the error. It's tricky to get the assertions right with the timing. I'll take a look at the weekend, but in the meantime it's possibly the case that there's some error in selecting the images and checking their natural width. Adding some console logging to see what it's actually finding and what you are expecting it to find might help! |
OK, I ran this myself (in the Edge runner, adding the appropriate commands), and while watching the browser locally it's clear that the test never actually loads the page "Android & iOS App". It remains stuck on "Ear Training Practice" (see screenshot). You're not going to be able to verify the images on the "Android & iOS App" page unless you actually switch to it first! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see below for the steps to remedy the issue you're encountering.
@@ -27,6 +28,8 @@ async function loadFirefoxDriver () { | |||
// so we need to use the second one first | |||
const driver_for_gutenberg = await loadFirefoxDriver(); | |||
const driver_for_ray_charles = await loadFirefoxDriver(); | |||
const driver_for_tonedear = await loadFirefoxDriver(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As the comment says above this block, the drivers need to be listed in reverse test order here, so that when the user runs the tests locally we see the Ray Charles first (which will be on top of the other windows). So please put the tonedear test above gutenberg in this list, and update the comment to reflect that there are three tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done Sir
aa8674e
to
66aeef5
Compare
@Jaifroid Another problem occurring , when i try to navigate to Android Page it won't, i think this is happening because i didn't know the exact path for it at first i used this then i looked into the Then i think i can do that by link but The link for the server remains same Can you help me with this path problem if we get it fixed then every tests will pass correctly. |
@THEBOSS0369 Oh no, this app doesn't support navigating to a page by URL fragment. There are two ways to get to a particular page: either click on the link that you highlight in the screenshot (easiest), or search for it using the search bar. Also, remember that the links you're clicking on are in the iframe, not at the top level, so you have to switch to the iframe before finding the link and clicking it. Take a look at the code in the Ray Charles test to see how to switch to the iframe. This explains why you said you were finding 21 images in the landing page when in fact there are none! You were finding these images in the app itself, as you hadn't switched to the iframe containing the content. |
@Jaifroid Sirrr ! it worked now its navigating to andorid page although the images are still not found now i will try to fix that |
@Jaifroid Sir all The tests have passed . Does any thing else needed to be added in the test? If yes then do let me know. The comments in this image for tonedear tests will not be visible in the main tests i have commented it out. |
@THEBOSS0369 That's very good news! I don't think we need more tests. I'll review the new code as soon as I can, but in the meantime, you might want to clean it up, remove any excessive timeouts you previously added, etc. Once the spec is ready, you should add it to all the other runners in the folders under Oh, I see GitHub tests have failed. I'll re-run those to be sure it wasn't a timeout fluke. |
@Jaifroid I think the tests are failing because when it navigate to android page it asks me to authorize the author and i used to press that maybe that's causing error. |
@Jaifroid Yes this is happening due to the reason i told above i didn't clicked the trust source this time and tests failed. I don't know how to fix this one |
This is because you erased https://github.com/kiwix/kiwix-js/blob/main/tests/e2e/spec/legacy-ray_charles.e2e.spec.js#L125 (the setting "noPrompts=true") from the URL when loading the app. This was in your previous spec, but then you did a hard reset of your branch, and you erased it, so it's no longer in the commit history. That command prevents the security prompt from showing. All you need to do is copy the appropriate code block from the ray charles version of the test. Also, in future, try to avoid rewriting history in your PRs. It makes things difficult to review as well, because when you do a force push, I have to reset my copy of your PR instead of simply pulling a new commit! (Don't worry, everyone makes these kinds of mistakes with PRs when learning.) |
@Jaifroid Done Sir! Now all tests passes well without any issue. I'm waiting for these tests to pass then i will add the tests in all the files and remove any unnecessary time waits.
My apologies Sir i didn't knew force push can do this much damage. I will be careful from next time 😅 |
Thank you! I'm just running the BrowserStack tests. |
@Jaifroid sir the tests are failing so is it the same dialog box issue this time because its getting timed out ? |
There seems to be an error |
Oh, I have an idea: you need to handle the case that the dialogue box ISN'T shown. Don't assume it will be there... In principle, it shouldn't be shown at all, due to a querystring we add 'noPrompt=true`. I wonder if that querystring was simply missing in the previous error you fixed? Because it's not missing in this test, the prompt doesn't show. |
What I'm saying is, check over your previous fix to see if the issue was that you were calling the app without |
@Jaifroid Sir I don't understand what's the problem here. let's divide all the possibilities
No sir , i didn't changed this since the first commit this is the code which is present since the start it('Load Kiwix JS and verify title', async function () {
await driver.get('http://localhost:' + port + '/dist/www/index.html?noPrompts=true');
await driver.sleep(1300);
it('Navigate from main page to Android & iOS section', async function () {
// Check for Dialog Box and click any Approve Button in subsequent dialog box
try {
const activeAlertModal = await driver.findElement(By.css('.modal[style*="display: block"]'));
if (activeAlertModal) {
// console.log('Found active alert modal');
const approveButton = await driver.findElement(By.id('approveConfirm'));
await approveButton.click();
}
} catch (e) {
// Do nothing
}
// Switch to the iframe if the content is inside 'articleContent'
I have got confused please clarify this sir 😓 |
Yes, I know you already added the code, but it chokes on looking for a dialogue box that didn't appear this time. I'm not sure why the dialogue box appeared the previous time -- my thought was that maybe the querystring telling it not to show was ommitted, but I didn't check the code. Did you see it this time? When I looked at the video, I didn't see the security diaologue box, and so the script got stuck because it couldn't find it. In any case, if it's sometimes appearing and sometimes not, your code needs to handle the situation in which it's not there. I.e., it should dismiss the dialogue if found, but just continue if not found within a certain amount of time. |
No sir i also didn't see any dialogue box appearing in the video. |
Still failing, I'm afraid. See https://github.com/kiwix/kiwix-js/actions/runs/12176007591/job/33960839227?pr=1286 . It correctly recognizes there is no dialogue box, and then fails to navigate to the iOS/Android page, apparently. In fact, it looks like you don't load the landing page at all? The app remains stuck on Configuration. Do you even load the ZIM, it doen's tlook like it? Perhaps because this is a ServiceWorker mode only test, you accidentally skip the loading of the ZIM (I'm just guessing). See BrowserStack report here for more info: https://automate.browserstack.com/builds/73815a6c7951be3a00e49ef6321ac1855566c1ba/sessions/088eed0cf1ab6ec43ecd5b2b4075a2607e7d0fb1?auth_token=0611b644be6ed3693eaa3cfd5f1e5ba1d16a364388143ff06da8a70c9a45bceb . |
@Jaifroid Sir i'm not sure why its happening i am going to do some changes and test it using only sw mode but right now in my local server the landing pages is loading correctly please see the video below for reference |
@THEBOSS0369 I think the difference is that in your local test you are running it first in Restricted mode (jQuery), and then in SW mode. In the affected test, only SW mode is called. Try replicating that locally, i.e. call the test with |
@Jaifroid sir solo sw mode tests are pasing as well please see the video Test.fail.sw.mode.mp4 |
@Jaifroid sir could be this be a browser specific issue because in latest version tests are not failing, so should we try it first in different browsers if this tests fail on those one as well then this issue is definitely in the code and if it passes in others then we can know why the problem's occuring ? |
OK. Another thing I noticed in the BrowserStack video was that the app reloaded itself just before tests started. That suggests it was having trouble loading and registering the Service Worker (it will keep reloading itself until the SW is registered correctly). It may be you need to increase the wait between loading the app's URL and starting the tests, to give the SW more time to register. You can of course experiment with skipping this test for now, so that the next ones run, then we'll know if it's a specific browser issue or a more general problem. |
Running tests. |
@Jaifroid sir I think the tests are failing due to the latest changes i made let me revert it back and see if it works and if not then i will have to do some experiments. Also sir is there any other way that i can run these tests myself and i don't have to disturb u again & again . |
sir i have reverted all changes and tets are passing in my local let's see if it passes this time or not |
@THEBOSS0369 Unfortunately this is now failing on Chrome 60. So it looks like it wasn't browser-specific. Here are the two failed runs:
I can give you write access to the Repo so that the BrowserStack tests run without my needing to intervene. However, my feeling is that the code to dismiss the security prompt may actually be the problem. As mentioned, if called correctly with the noPrompts querystring this prompt should never show, so we shouldn't need to have code dealing with it. I would try removing that, and then if we find that there is a security prompt, we can fix that with the npPrompts... |
@THEBOSS0369 An invite has been sent to you to accept write access to the Repo. Use this with extreme responsibility. It should mean the BrowserStack tests run when you push (after you've accepted the invite). I can give you access to the BrowserStack system so you can look at the videos for yourself. For that, please send me a private message on the Kiwix Slack. |
(You may need to push directly to the Repo for the BS tests to run, rather than pushing from a fork, I'm not 100% certain. Try pushing as normal, and if it doesn't work I can explain how to push directly to a branch, so the tests run.) |
Got it sir i will do the pushing with extreme care without touching anything else. |
This PR Fixes #1205
Hello Everyone!
Description
In this PR i have added an automated Selenium UI test for a small Zimit2 archive (used
tonedear.com_en_2024-09.zim
)The tests i have added are as follows :
Test
I have done all the necessary test
npm test
no issuetests-e2e-firefox
-> All tests Passed Below is the ssScreenshot for tests